I'm not going to call Bioshock Infinite perfect. I may even walk
back the masterpiece label a few months from now, I may even refuse
to give it my personal goty. But the backlash its been getting
recently is becoming absurd.
The game had done the impossible. It
built up expectations to ridiculous levels, and in the eyes of the
first wave of critics, it meet them with aplomb. Which is great
because I almost never get to use “aplomb.” Perhaps the reviews
were too positive, perhaps it made people’s already soaring
expectations even higher, or perhaps some chose to tear down
something that didn't fit what they believed would help the medium. Can you guess which one I think it is?
Cliff Blezinski of Raleigh's Epic
Games(Gears of War developer) and Kirk Hamilton of Kotaku.com
have written articles on why they think Infinite's violence exists to
largely diminish it's artistic impact. Hamilton writes “BioShock
Infinite is in many ways so, so close to being That Game,
the one we can show to our non-gamer friends and say "See? Look
at this! It is so awesome! Check out the story! It's like LOST!
How neat is this?" Blezinski, whose opinions are sound even
though they scream double standard, blogged essentially the same
sentiment.
 |
| yeah, it ain't subtle. |
They make good points...the thing is...
the thing that really bothers me...the thing that makes my right
eyelid twitch is that both knew exactly what this game was going
to be. The violence was on full
display from a bare minimum of two years ago. Where were these
opinions then? Why was it OK to let Irrational games get a pass only
for these folks to rope off it's place in history for being what it
never tried not to be? Its just too damn convenient.
The
discussion of video game violence, in terms of market saturation,
needs to happen. It's a problem. I'd personally love it if the
industry took a year off and only produced non violent material.
Think about how amazing that would be! Think about what new types of
game play could be devised when avoiding the crutch of violent
conflict became necessary. I have no problem with this debate, I have
a problem with people projecting their personal hang ups on what is
objectively a wonderful “product.” A product with a budget and
coffers to fill.
Games
of this caliber have always been, and always will be, profit first and
art second. Violence is the easiest way to sell that product, and
that’s the only way a game about 20th
century racism ever
got a budget over $80 million dollars. The game trades off
intellectualism with popular tastes and everyone knew that going in.
So what the hell happened? A bunch of critics,in so many words, called it “art.”*
 |
| The actual game may not be as imaginative as this concept piece...but its scary how close it gets. |
But
could you call Infinite “art?” I'd certainly like too. Daniel Golding at ABC.net would try to choke me to death with his monocle
chain, but I think time will be very kind to the game. I'm not even
going to bother with Golding, he's...set in his ways, so I'm driving the conversation back to Kotaku. Hamilton wanted
validation from his non-gaming peers. That's a great goal, and I hope
he finds his bright shining example one day (portal 2).
Yes, I agree there was too much shooting, and I would have loved for the last act of the game to have slowed down a bit and maybe eschewed violence all together. I wouldn't have seen that coming. But jumping from that point to
practically dismissing its existence because its a shooter is sanctimonious
and just plain mean.
These
people didn't have to play it, and they don't have to like it. But
they can't fault the developers who poured the last five years of
their lives into a shooter only to have people like Hamilton hang the
entire genre around their neck like an albatross. So please. Talk
about video game violence. Talk about better ways for shooters to
tell stories. Stop dragging Infinite into it, it knew it was never anything but popular entertainment and it tried some new things. It can't be everything to everyone and it shouldn't have to explain itself that way.
Lets all just take a step back, look at the game's strengths and weaknesses, and talk it out over some cotton candy.
 |
| Serenity from Spun Sugar. |
*He
doesn’t use the word, but he really really
wants to.
No comments:
Post a Comment